🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations was effective, and revealed recent overtures had been made by mediators to reopen talks with the US government. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Course

The foreign minister is walking a complex course since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations used their authority to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The American leader in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be settled by armed force. He said the assaults started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust hard to restore.

Diplomacy Stays the Primary Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to dictate their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the ultimate resolution to settle disagreements, but its standards, regulations and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the same tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the country in the face of this attack."